Reproductive Health Bill Essay

II. BODYThe first cadence the Reproductive Health Bill was proposed was in 1998. During the model 15th Congress, the RH Bills filed are those authored by endure Minority Leader Edcel Lagman of Albay, HB 96 Iloilo Rep. Janette Garin, HB 101, Akbayan Representatives Kaka Bag-ao & Walden Bello HB 513, Muntinlupa Representative Rodolfo Biazon, HB 1160, Iloilo Representative Augusto Syjuco, HB 1520, Gabriela Rep. Luzviminda Ilagan. In the Senate, Sen. Miriam Defensor Santiago has filed her own version of the RH neb which, she says, will be part of the countrys commitment to international covenants. On January 31, 2011, the House of Representatives Committee on creation and Family Relations voted to consolidate completely House versions of the bill, which is entitled An Act Providing for a Comprehensive Policy on Responsible Parenthood, Reproductive Health and Population Development and for Other Purposes. adept of the main concerns of the bill, according to the Ex deviseatory Note, is that population of the Philippines makes it the 12th most populous nation in the humans today, that the Filipino womens fertility rate is at the upper bracket of 206 countries. It states that studies and surveys show that the Filipinos are responsive to having smaller-sized families by means of free natural selection of family planning methods. It also refers to studies which show that rapid population yield exacerbates poverty while poverty spawns rapid population growth. And so it aims for improved quality of life through a consistent and coherent national population policy.Reproductive wellness is a state of achieve physical, mental and social well- existence and non merely the absence of disease or infirmity, in all matters relating to the procreative system and to its functions and processes. Reproductive health therefore implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life and that they have the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, w hen and how frequently to do so. Implicit in this last condition are the compensate of men and women to be advised and to have access to safe, effective, affordable and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, as well as other methods of their choice for regulation of fertility which are not against the law, and the right of access to appropriate health- tending services that will modify women to go safely through pregnancy and childbirth and provide couples with the best chance of having a respectable infant. In line with the above definition of reproductive health, reproductive health wish well is defined as the constellation of methods, techniques and services that contribute to reproductive health and well-being through go oning and solving reproductive health problems.It also includes sexual health, the purpose of which is the enhancement of life and in the flesh(predicate) relations, and not merely counselling and care related to reproduction and sexuall y transmitted diseases. 7.3. Bearing in mind the above definition, reproductive rights get the picture certain human rights that are already recognized in national laws, international human rights documents and other relevant United Nations consensus documents. These rights rest on the recognition of the basic right of all couples and individuals to decide freely and responsibly the number, spacing and timing of their children and to have the information and means to do so, and the right to attain the highest timeworn of sexual.There are 6 bills pertaining to reproductive health and/or population management that have been filed for computation in both the House of Representatives and the Senate for the 15th Congress.The most controversial of these bills is House Bill No. 96 authored by Rep. Edcel Lagman. House Bill No. 96, also known as the proposed Reproductive Health and Population and Development Act of 2010, will cover the following areasmidwives of skilled attendanceemergenc y obstetric careaccess to family planningmaternal death reviewfamily planning supplies as essential medicinesbenefits for serious and spartan reproductive health conditionsmobile health care servicemandatory age-appropriate reproductive health and sexual urge educationresponsibility of local family planning office and certificate of compliancecapability building of barangay health workersideal family sizeemployers responsibilitiesmulti-media campaignimplementing mechanismsreporting requirementsprohibited actspenaltiesThe bill is controversial, as it is being opposed by concerned citizens, especially the pro-life, pro-family and pro-God groups, regardless of creed or religion. The Roman Catholic Church expresses its opposition against the bill on many counts, most especially the procurement and statistical distribution of family planning supplies for the whole country, when the available recite from peer reviewed medical journals supports the hypothesis that when ovulation and fert ilization occur in women taking oral contraceptives (OCs) or exploitation intrauterine devices (IUD), post-fertilization effects are operative on occasion to prevent clinically recognized pregnancy. hormonal contraceptives and/or IUDs directly affect the endometrium. These effects have been presumed to render the endometrium relatively inhospitable to implantation or to the maintenance of the preembryo or embryo prior to clinically recognized pregnancy. These make pills and IUDS abortifacient.Pro-life groups, and many professionals in the medical and nursing fields, believe that physicians and policy makers should understand and respect the beliefs of patients who consider human life to be present and valuable from the moment of fertilization. Patients should be made fully aware of this information so that they stooge consent to or refuse the use of stylised contraceptives.However, the position of the Catholic Church and the pro-life groups does not mean that they espouse the att itude of natalism at all costs, as if the number of children, in itself, were the unmistakable signboard of authentic christian matrimonial life.The sexual act, properly exercised within marriage only, is ordained primarily to the denotation of life. If there are reasonable motives for spacing births, such as serious medical conditions in the mother, or extreme poverty, then the Catholic Church teaches that married couples may take advantage of the natural cycles of the reproductive system and use their marriage precisely those times that are infertile (natural family planning).Other aspects of the bill being contested by concerned citizens include the classification of family planning supplies as essential medicines when their safety/perniciousness profile and legal permissibility are questionable. At the same time, more importance should be given to the popular diseases, the top ten leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the Philippines, namely, infections such as pneumon ia and tuberculosis. Financial resources distribute by foreign donors to assist the Philippine government programs could actually be better spent towards pursue health programs targeting communicable diseases than purchasing artificial contraceptives.Very pertinent to the debate about reproduction rights is the right to life. The Philippine Constitution says that the State shall equally protect the life of the mother and the life of the unborn from conception. If artificial contraceptives are medically proven to induce abortion as one of their mechanisms of action, then procurement and distribution of such family planning supplies are unconstitutional and illegal.Benefits of the RH BillAllow couples to make decision to plan for their familiesThe RH Bills gives the couples and the women, specifically, the choice and freedom on the mode of family planning they want to pursue depending on their needs, choice, personal convictions and religious beliefs. But the RH Bill is not just abo ut the family planning Prevents spread of sexually transmitted disease like aids and STDs and eventually control population growth necessary for frugal development The liberal minds view the RH Bill as a strategy in chip overpopulation and the spreading of AID and STD diseases. Thats what they say. They believe that the natural way of family planning is passe in this time of modern age. They want children as early as in their pre-teens to be taught about sex education. conjure womans health as she will be able to determine when to get enceinte The women can determine when they want to get pregnant. Through this will, it will ensure the health of the women, which can be put to risk with pre-existing condition such as diabetes or pregnancies with not much perturbation or spaced-closed together. They will gain more control over their bodies and health. This will also ensure the children of having a healthy mother to take care of them.Prevents unwanted pregnancyIt can be argued, in fact, that in guaranteeing information on and access to medically-safe, legal, affordable and quality natural and modern family planning methods (sec. 2), the bill seeks to prevent unwanted, unplanned and mistimed pregnancies the main cause of induced abortions